Test and results » History » Version 3
SANCHEZ, Eduardo, 03/26/2017 10:33 AM
1 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | h1. Performance analysis and results |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
3 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | Several tests are carried out in order to evaluate the performance of the developed channel emulator. Firstly, it must be verified that the required Eb/No level is achieved at the demodulator output. Secondly, the time delay of transmitted packets must be measured to guarantee compliance with the specified delay. |
4 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
5 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | h2. Noise measurements |
6 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
7 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | In order to measure Eb/No level in the transmission, a first approach consist of using the monitoring tools of the modem configuration interface. Figure 1 shows the measured carrier-to-noise power over 2 minutes for 0 dB, 5 dB, 10 dB, 15 dB, 20 dB and 50 dB. |
8 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
9 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Noise_test_bench.png! |
10 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 1. Test bench used to measure Eb/No* |
11 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
12 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Modem_carrier_to_noise_ratio.png! |
13 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 2. Eb/No measurements obtained from the modem interface* |
14 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
15 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Ip_throughput_for_5dBand0dB.png! |
16 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 3. IP throughput for 5 dB and 0 dB* |
17 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
18 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Degradation_introduced_by_the_emulator.png! |
19 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 4. Eb/No degradation introduced by the emulator* |
20 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
21 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Load_effect.png! |
22 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 5. Output power degradation introduced by the emulator* |
23 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
24 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Input_demodulator_spectrum.png! |
25 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 6. Signal-to-noise power measurements carried out with the spectrum analyzer* |
26 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
27 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Degradation_in_the_output_level.png! |
28 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 7. Signal power degradation due to the emulator* |
29 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
30 | 3 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | h2. Delay measurements |
31 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
32 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Delay_test_bench_2.png! |
33 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 8. Test bench used to measure a reference round trip time* |
34 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
35 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Delay_test_bench.png! |
36 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 9. Test bench used to measure the total round trip time* |
37 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
38 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%} Total_delay_without_emulator.png! |
39 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 10. Round trip time measurements using the ping command (10 packets of 1B and 1500B, respectively) when the emulator is not connected* |
40 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
41 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Delay050100150200_1bytes.png! |
42 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 11. Round trip time measurements using the ping command (10 packets of 1B) when the emulator is connected for different delays values* |
43 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | |
44 | 2 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | p=. !{width:50%}Delay050100150200_1500bytes.png! |
45 | 1 | SANCHEZ, Eduardo | *Figure 12. Round trip time measurements using the ping command (10 packets of 1500B) when the emulator is connected for different delays values* |