IV - Extra » History » Version 11

COLIN, Tony, 12/16/2015 03:07 PM

1 3 COLIN, Tony
h1. IV - Extra
2 2 COLIN, Tony
3 7 COLIN, Tony
{{>toc}}
4 7 COLIN, Tony
5 8 COLIN, Tony
h2. 1. CubeSat performances.
6 1 COLIN, Tony
7 5 COLIN, Tony
h3. 1.1 Measurement of encoding/decoding time.
8 5 COLIN, Tony
9 9 COLIN, Tony
h4. 1.1.1 In simulation.
10 9 COLIN, Tony
11 4 COLIN, Tony
POSIX requires that CLOCKS_PER_SEC equals 1000000 independent of the actual resolution.
12 4 COLIN, Tony
13 4 COLIN, Tony
p=. !Clock1.png!
14 4 COLIN, Tony
*1000 ticks per milliseconds*
15 4 COLIN, Tony
16 4 COLIN, Tony
p=. !Clock2.png!
17 4 COLIN, Tony
*Time measurement of data encoding*
18 4 COLIN, Tony
19 4 COLIN, Tony
p=. !Clock3.png!
20 4 COLIN, Tony
*Printing clock data*
21 4 COLIN, Tony
22 4 COLIN, Tony
p=. !Time_RS_resized.PNG!
23 4 COLIN, Tony
*Chart of Reed Solomon time measurement*
24 1 COLIN, Tony
25 9 COLIN, Tony
h4. 1.1.2 With Floating-Point OPeration (FLOP)
26 4 COLIN, Tony
27 4 COLIN, Tony
p=. !FLOPs2.png!
28 4 COLIN, Tony
29 4 COLIN, Tony
30 1 COLIN, Tony
Hence, encoding stands for *O(nbytes x NPAR)* with _nbytes_ is the codeword length, _NPAR_ the number of parity bits.
31 1 COLIN, Tony
Since it is a systematic code _nbytes = information_word_length + NPAR_ encoding stands for *O(information_word_length)* with NPAR constant.
32 9 COLIN, Tony
33 9 COLIN, Tony
Note that a more accurate way would be to consider processor speed and Salvo function OSGetTiks :
34 10 COLIN, Tony
p=. !OSGetTiks.PNG!
35 5 COLIN, Tony
36 5 COLIN, Tony
h3. 1.2 Busy memory on CubeSat.
37 5 COLIN, Tony
38 5 COLIN, Tony
p=. !Memory.png!
39 5 COLIN, Tony
40 5 COLIN, Tony
---
41 1 COLIN, Tony
42 7 COLIN, Tony
h2. 2. Current topics.
43 6 COLIN, Tony
44 6 COLIN, Tony
For the purpose of reliability for Land Mobile Satellite (LMS) channel, a solution is discussed about error correcting code on the Transport layer [1]. Regarding new trends of erasure codes related to satellites [2], an efficient way to perform encoding over LMS channel is to consider _Non-Binary codes_ such as Reed-Solomon code (studied in [[III - Advanced Project]] chapter) or Non-Binary LDPC code (which is highly complex to implement). The Non-Binary characteristic would be to consider a whole packet or a sliced packet as a symbol in order to decrease the error probability of packets. 
45 11 COLIN, Tony
A possible continuity to this project could be to integrate the OpenFEC code available on "OpenFEC - Downloads":http://openfec.org/downloads.html in the CubeSat Kit. This would be easily done by following chapter [[II - Tutorial - Simple project on CubeSat Kit|II - Tutorial]] and [[III - Advanced Project|III - Advanced Project]] that could be a integration pattern for any CubeSat project.
46 6 COLIN, Tony
47 1 COLIN, Tony
Research papers proposed on IEEE Website :
48 6 COLIN, Tony
[1] "Transport layer coding for the land mobile satellite channel":http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1391458&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D1391458
49 6 COLIN, Tony
[2] "Erasure Codes for Space Communications: Recent Findings and New Challenges":http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=6333092&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D6333092
50 6 COLIN, Tony
51 6 COLIN, Tony
---