Presentation of results » History » Version 4
NIESS, Marielle, 03/22/2015 01:25 PM
1 | 1 | NIESS, Marielle | h1. Presentation of results |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
3 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | We have done two kinds of test, first streaming of an HD video (1080p) and streaming of an SD video (480p). |
4 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
5 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | * HD streaming |
6 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
7 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | We have done the tests for different Es/N0 and the result is the same, the received video can not see, indeed here is two videos who permits to see the behavior of the channel. |
8 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
9 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | The videos are the transmission recording, we have 2 videos one for an Es/N0 of 5 dB and another for 30 dB, the videos are in joint piece. |
10 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
11 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
12 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | We have done a survey (mark between 0 of 5 concerning the video) over about 30 people concerning the streaming of HD videos according several Es/N0, here is the results: |
13 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
14 | 3 | NIESS, Marielle | |_. Es/N0 |_. 5 dB |_. 10 dB |_. 20 dB |_. 30 dB | |
15 | 3 | NIESS, Marielle | |=. quality of experience |=. 0 |=. 0 |=. 0 |=. 0 | |
16 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
17 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | > *The question now is, what happen ?* |
18 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
19 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | First here is the Ber versus the Es/N0 for different ModCod. |
20 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
21 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | !Ber! |
22 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
23 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | In our simulation we use an QPSK ¾, we see with the previous figure that from about 5dB the transmission can be considered as quasi error free (No error of transmission), so the problem of HD streaming in our simulation is not the BER of the transmission. |
24 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
25 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | One of the remaining possible issue is the bandwidth and the bit rate. Indeed when we want to do streaming of HD videos we need to have 35 Mbits/s as bit rate. Here in our simulation we configure a symbols rate as 512 k Symbols/s, we use a QPSK for the transmission, so we have about 1 Mbit/s total bit rate for the “pipe” between the hub and the station via the satellite. Therefore it is not possible to do HD streaming because we do not have enough available bit rate. |
26 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
27 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | To confirm our hypothesis we have done the SD streaming simulation. Indeed with we need a smaller bit rate. |
28 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
29 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | * SD streaming |
30 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
31 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | We perform the same simulations but here for an SD videos and the result are really different. |
32 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
33 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | The videos are the transmission recording, we have 2 videos one for an Es/N0 of 5 dB and another for 30 dB, the videos are in joint piece. |
34 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
35 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | We see that now we are able to see the video streaming. The video is almost indentic for the different bit rate because we are in the quasi no error area. We are able to play the video because for an 480p streaming we need about 1 Mbit/s and that the available bandwidth for our link. |
36 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | Here is a table representing the quality of experience for the videos according the Es/N0. That survey has been done over approximately 30 people. |
37 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
38 | 4 | NIESS, Marielle | |_. Es/N0 |_. 5 dB |_. 10 dB |_. 20 dB |_. 30 dB | |
39 | 4 | NIESS, Marielle | |=. quality of experience |=. 3.21 |=. 3.21 |=. 3.21 |=. 3.21 | |
40 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
41 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | * Conclusion |
42 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
43 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
44 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle | |
45 | 2 | NIESS, Marielle |