Implementation » History » Version 14
SERRA FONT, Anna, 03/18/2015 12:22 PM
1 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | h1. Implementation |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
3 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | At this point we were familiar with the system analyse of a link budget, knowledge acquired throughout the different subjects imparted in the master course and especially thanks to the realisation of the project 2 (_Design of a regional multi-beam satellite system_), that has an strong bond with the present project. |
4 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
5 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Diagram block of application development |
6 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
7 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | The diagram below shows the planning with the different phases we have designed in order to perform the successful and coherent development of the tool. |
8 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
9 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | {UPDATE} Block diagram |
10 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
11 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p=. !{width: 70%}figure4.jpg! |
12 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
13 | 13 | SERRA FONT, Anna | In short, the first steps were to decide what would be the basic structure of our link budget program and identify all the parameters and possible calculations, as well as the logical place to perform them in this structure. Thus, a preliminary design with the fundamental and simplest conditions has been performed, to then add gradually other features in order to improve its capabilities. Finally, verification of results and testing with subjects has been done in order to finish the complete design of the tool. These steps are further explained below. |
14 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
15 | 13 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
16 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
17 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Overview Application Plan |
18 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
19 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | At the beginning of this project it was essential to ask ourselves about what we would expect of tool a Link Budget Tool. For instance, some thoughts we considered were: _If I had an analysis tool... what would I do with it? What would be the settings I give? What would be the results that I expect?_ |
20 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
21 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | Hence, in order to design a tool to help with the comprehension of the link budget analysis, we have had to ask each time the question _"How will I present my results and information?”_. This leads us to the *GUI (Graphical User Interface)*, one of the key points of this project. |
22 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
23 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | When we thought about all this aspects, we know what it has to do, which are the necessary parameters and results we want to show, etc. At this point, we can start to design our screen according to this. Thus, we identified the topology of the satellite communication system and we divided it in the following block groups: |
24 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
25 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * *Service:* ... |
26 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * *System Geometry:* ... |
27 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * *Uplink:* ... |
28 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * *Payload:* ... |
29 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * *Downlink:* ... |
30 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * *Overall link:* ... |
31 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
32 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
33 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Preliminary design |
34 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
35 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | It is known that link budget equations can become messy and complex and this calculus involve several aspects and conditions, furthermore, link budget can be analysed from different points of view. Globally, it can be defined with the following approaches: |
36 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * The first approach is a feasibility study: The user gives the features of the system, the targeted service, the bit rate, the bit error rate, etc., and the link budget says either if it is possible with this margin or if this is not possible (negative margin). |
37 | 5 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
38 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * In the second approach the user also defines the features of the system, and then the link budget says what is possible to do in terms of bit rate, bit error rate, etc. |
39 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
40 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Finally there is a third approach where the user says which is the service he would like to have, and the link budget tool finds all the system settings. But this approach is much more complex, because as there are several parameters to define, it turns into a lot of different configuration options. |
41 | 13 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
42 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | tip. Explicar los primeros cálculos básicos del link budget. The idea was to at first design the main link budget. |
43 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
44 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
45 | 13 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
46 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Added features |
47 | 13 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
48 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | tip. Citar y detallar un poco todas las características añadidas a fur et a mesure. |
49 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
50 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Final design |
51 | 5 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
52 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | tip. Capturas finales de las distintas pantallas |
53 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
54 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Validation & Final tests |
55 | 5 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
56 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | tip. Explicar que se han hecho tests y cómo hemos comprobado resultados |
57 | 11 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
58 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Delivery Application |
59 | 1 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
60 | 14 | SERRA FONT, Anna | tip. Breve párrafo diciendo que el logiciel está terminado e introducir el manual de usuario que se detalla en How to do? |