Link Budget » History » Version 17
RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson , 03/20/2015 04:55 AM
1 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h1. Satellite Link Budget |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
3 | 2 | SERRA FONT, Anna | In this section we are going to explain what is a satellite link budget and what are the main parameters it involves. |
4 | 2 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
5 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | h2. Satellite Communication System |
6 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
7 | 12 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Assuming that a telecommunication system is composed by a transmitter a medium and a receiver, the link budget is the accounting of all gain and losses in the power signal from the transmitter, passing through the medium, to the receiver.So, the link budget analyse how much power is lost in the signal path, and can discriminate the loss power values of each cause of loss. |
8 | 13 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
9 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p. To easily understand, we can analyse the satellite system showed in figure 1. Considering a signal one-way-travel, and just analyzing the individual uplink path, the link budget will perform the power received by the satellite taking in account the amplification and the attenuation of the link.The link, in this case, is composed by the transmitter: the _Earth Station_, the media: _the atmosphere and free space_ ,and the receiver: _the Satellite_. Then in the link budget calculating we taking in account the following losses and gains: |
10 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
11 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Gain of the transmitter and receiver amplifier. |
12 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Attenuation in the atmosphere propagation. |
13 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Depointing losses. |
14 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Polarization mismatch losses. |
15 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Losses in transmitting and receiving equipment. |
16 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
17 | 12 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
18 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | p=. !{width: 50%}figure2.png! |
19 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
20 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | >>> . Figure 2 - Gain and losses from a signal travelling from a transmitter to a receiver, considering a uplink path. *P* is the power before the transmitter amplifier, *Gain* is the transmitter amplifier gain, *PR* is the power received, *Loss 1* the power lost due to the transmitter equipment, *Loss 2* the power lost due to the atmosphere effects, *Loss 3* the power lost due to the receiver equipment. |
21 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
22 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p. To evaluate the quality of our link, one important measure is the Bit Error Rate, $BER$. If we want that our signal maintain a low $BER$ we must to start with a higher power and make sure that even with all losses along the path way, we'll have enough power available at each point to keep this $BER$ value.The $BER$ is a function of the bit energy per noise-density of the signal $\frac{Eb}{No}$ of the signal. The ratio between $BER$ and $\frac{Eb}{No}$ depends on the digital modulating implemented. An example of $BER$ x $\frac{Eb}{No}$ graphic is showed in figure 3. Higher $\frac{Eb}{No}$ means better quality. |
23 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
24 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p=. !{width: 40%}figure3.png! |
25 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
26 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | >>> . Figure 3 - Exemples of $BER$ x $\frac{Eb}{No}$ graphics. M-PSK constellations. |
27 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
28 | 14 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Other important parameters used to consider in link budget analysis performance are: |
29 | 16 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Link performance: Carrier-to-noise power ratio $$ \frac{C}{No} $$ |
30 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | |
31 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | It's a measure of the power received by receiving equipment C, and the noise power density, introduced in the transmission medium. It's is also a measure of the quality of modulated carrier in the receiver input. |
32 | 15 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | * Transmit equipment performance towards receiver: Effective isotropic radiated power $$EIRP$$ |
33 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | Is a measure of the power $P_T$ and the performance of the transmit equipment in the direction of the receiver. It is expressed in dBW. |
34 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * Receiving equipment performance:Figure of merit $$G/T$$ |
35 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | The figure of merit is expressed by a ratio between the maximum gain of a receiving antenna to the system equivalent noise temperature.In general it is expressed in dB/K. This relation is also a measure of the ability of the receiver to receive a signal with good quality (high carrier-to-noise ratio). |
36 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
37 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | The figure 4 shows the detailed parameters involved in a satellite link. |
38 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
39 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | p=. !{width: 30%}figure4.png! |
40 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | |
41 | 17 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | >>> . Figure 4 - Link configuration. |
42 | 12 | RIBAS MACHADO, Ederson | tip. |
43 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | To fully understand what is the link budget first we must understand how it is formed a satellite communication system. A satellite system is composed of three operational components: the _ground segment_, the _space segment_ and the _control segment_. |
44 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * The _space segment_ contains the satellite itself (or satellite constellation) and the uplink and downlink satellite links. |
45 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * The _ground segment_ consists of all the traffic earth stations. |
46 | 1 | SERRA FONT, Anna | * The _control segment_ consists of the ground facilities and systems for control and monitoring the satellite. |