PART41 » History » Version 29
COLIN, Tony, 03/20/2016 03:58 PM
1 | 3 | COLIN, Tony | h1. PART 4 : Position Estimation. |
---|---|---|---|
2 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | |
3 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | {{toc}} |
4 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | |
5 | 13 | COLIN, Tony | p(. Once the navigation bits from at least 4 satellites have been retrieved from the acquisition/tracking part, it is possible to estimate the desired position of the receiver. |
6 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | |
7 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | --- |
8 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | |
9 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | h2. 1 - Ephemeris. |
10 | 2 | COLIN, Tony | |
11 | 16 | COLIN, Tony | GPS uses a particular algorithm in order to characterise satellite position. In comparison with GLONASS, this method requires more parameters, but less complexity. |
12 | 16 | COLIN, Tony | |
13 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | h3. a - Introduction of satellite orbit. |
14 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | |
15 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !OrbitalPlanePositioningMin.png! |
16 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *Figure 4.1 :* Orbital plane positioning. |
17 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | |
18 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !OrbitPositioningInTheOrbitalPlaneMin.png! |
19 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *Figure 4.2 :* Orbital plane positioning. |
20 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | |
21 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !SatellitePositioningMin.png! |
22 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *Figure 4.3 :* Orbital plane positioning. |
23 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | |
24 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | h3. b - GPS satellite ephemeris data. |
25 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | |
26 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Eph12min.png! |
27 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *Figure 4.4 :* List of ephemeris parameters included in GPS frames. |
28 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | |
29 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | h3. c - GPS satellite position calculation algorithm. |
30 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | |
31 | 28 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Alg12min.png! |
32 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *Figure 4.5 :* Description of the algorithm step by step. |
33 | 18 | COLIN, Tony | |
34 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | These tables are extracted from GPS Interface Control Document *[3]* |
35 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
36 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | --- |
37 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
38 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | h2. 2 - Navigation computation. |
39 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | |
40 | 19 | COLIN, Tony | h3. a - Reminder about the range impairments. |
41 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
42 | 4 | COLIN, Tony | The following figure gives the impairments affecting the range in case of the GPS system as well as the correction process : |
43 | 4 | COLIN, Tony | |
44 | 4 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !003.PNG! |
45 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *Figure 4.6 :* Pseudo-range measurement extracted from *[4]* |
46 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
47 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | h3. b - Demonstration of the Pseudo-ranges with Least Square method. |
48 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
49 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | Starting from the fact that can determine most of the elements within the pseudo-range measurement PR_sat(i) from the information provided by each satellite, we have the equation : |
50 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
51 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos1.png! |
52 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 1* |
53 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
54 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | or put in another way, |
55 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
56 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos2.png! |
57 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 2* |
58 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
59 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | Indeed 4 measurements are needed, providing 4 equations with 4 unknows which are the receiver coordinates and the clock bias of the receiver. As the equation is highly non-linear, it is important to proceed to a linearization such as the Taylor expansion : |
60 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
61 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos3.png! |
62 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 3* |
63 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
64 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | Hence, |
65 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
66 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos4.png! |
67 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 4* |
68 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
69 | 24 | COLIN, Tony | In practise, for a receiver located e.g. in France PR (t_0) can be described by Paris location as initialization for the algorithm. |
70 | 21 | COLIN, Tony | In vectorial form the equation becomes : |
71 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
72 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos5.png! |
73 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 5* |
74 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
75 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | which can be expressed as : |
76 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
77 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos6.png! |
78 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 6* |
79 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
80 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | with the Least Square solution : |
81 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | |
82 | 7 | COLIN, Tony | p=. !Pos7.png! |
83 | 8 | COLIN, Tony | *Equation 7* |
84 | 8 | COLIN, Tony | |
85 | 8 | COLIN, Tony | Thus, it is possible to retrieve the receiver position. |
86 | 5 | COLIN, Tony | |
87 | 25 | COLIN, Tony | _Note that all unknowns are depicted in red color._ |
88 | 25 | COLIN, Tony | |
89 | 25 | COLIN, Tony | |
90 | 25 | COLIN, Tony | h3. c - Kalman filter. |
91 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | |
92 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | Another position estimation method is Kalman filter i.e. an algorithm that uses a series of measurements observed over time, containing statistical noise and other inaccuracies, and produces estimates of unknown variables that tend to be more precise than those based on a single measurement alone. |
93 | 1 | COLIN, Tony | In this project, a single measurement will be used for "simplicity" purposes, therefore, the Least Square method is more appropriate for this issue. |
94 | 25 | COLIN, Tony | |
95 | 25 | COLIN, Tony | --- |
96 | 5 | COLIN, Tony | |
97 | 5 | COLIN, Tony | *References :* |
98 | 5 | COLIN, Tony | *[1]* K. Borre, D. M. Akos, N. Bertelsen, P. Rinder, S. H. Jensen, A software-defined GPS and GALILEO receiver |
99 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *[2]* M. Bousquet, Orbits and Satellite Platforms lecture script, January 2016 |
100 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *[3]* GPS Interface Control Document under http://www.gps.gov/technical/icwg/IS-GPS-200H.pdf |
101 | 29 | COLIN, Tony | *[4]* Position Estimation Workshop, March 2016 |