Conclusions » History » Version 6

HAENNIG, Gerald, 12/14/2015 11:36 PM

1 2 GOMEZ, Ramon
h1. 5. Conclusions
2 3 HAENNIG, Gerald
3 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
h2. 5.1 Link comparison : Optical link vs Coaxial Cable for 30 m link length (like in a home)
4 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
5 5 HAENNIG, Gerald
|_. Parameter|_. Coaxial Cable|_. Optical Link |
6 5 HAENNIG, Gerald
|RF Gain @ 950 MHz [dB]|-3.6 |+0.5|
7 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|RF Gain @ 2150 MHz [dB]|-5.6|+3.0|
8 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|Noise Figure @ 950 MHz [dB]|+3.6|+30|
9 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|Noise Figure @ 2150 MHz|+5.6|+33|
10 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|IIP3 [dBm]|+50 |+10|
11 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|SFDR [dB/Hz2/3]|+145|+102|
12 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|LNB remote supply|Yes|No, supply close to antenna for OTX required|
13 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|Current Consumption [mA]|0|700 mA / 12 V|
14 6 HAENNIG, Gerald
|LNB telecommand|Yes|No|
15 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|Bidirectional link|Yes|Yes, but with additional hardware|
16 4 HAENNIG, Gerald
|Cost|Low|High|